Toxic free cosmetics - For long-term health

The option for the non-toxic cosmetics is the best thing you can do for your skin and your health and the environment. Improving your beauty through plant products and mineral makeup and cosmetics organic cosmetics is the new way to promote long-term health. There is no reason why you must continue the use of toxic cosmetics.

Most of the cosmetics on the market are made of chemicals that are banned elsewhere. This is incomprehensible to the position of our government, which gives the hands-free cosmetics maker to make a rampant use of these harmful chemicals. This issue, although discussed in this article shall be dealt with in detail in a separate article. The first thing we must do is find a way to protect our skin and the general welfare of the harmful effects of these toxic cosmetics.

New research has shown that exposure to toxic chemicals that raise havoc with the hormones may increase breast cancer risk. This is particularly true for adolescents and pregnant women when exposed to the active substances in cosmetic products. Europe has made great progress in the regulation of cosmetics. The European Union (EU) approved an amendment to the "Cosmetics Directive", the law which regulates cosmetics in the EU 15 countries. The ban any and all chemicals that are known or highly suspected of causing cancer, birth defects of birth, or genetic mutations for use in cosmetic products. Hundreds of chemicals (over 1100) were banned.

Some U.S. companiescosmetics responded by saying that "American women are less concerned about cosmetics as Europeans." How dare they decide what means one has! A large cosmetics firm had a real disconnect and responded to a written request regarding the use of Pthalates (pronounced tha-lates and just a fancy word for fragrance and is in more than 79% of all cosmetic products ), saying that "the U.S. has the safest products that our laws allow for both consumers and the environment." However, South Korea, the same company, in response to similar consumer concerns, acted in a manner somewhat different from the "Women's Committee of the Korean Federation for Environmental Movement" of the test 24 products for toxic ingredient known as Pthalates. One hundred percent of the products tested had Pthalates. Ninety-six percent had more than two Pthalates. Fifty percent had more than three and eight percent had four different types. Now the same company that responded to the U.S. survey saying what was safe, now in South Korea responded in this way. "Our company does not use DEHP and DBP (Pthalates), which have been proposed as components of our products." Subsequently, Pthalates eliminated all of its products.

Another large company, took a position in the U.S., but when challenged in the UK, said:. "We agree with the position of the Network of Women Environment in the inherent potential toxicological Pthalates We take a precautionary approach and only use an ingredient if it is safe and approved for use in cosmetic products. As a result of this approach, already exists a program to eliminate Pthalates of our products. "

In April 2004 there was a march on the U.S. Capitol that organizers said was the largest of its kind. More than a million people joined the march for women's lives and became the launching pad for an organization known as the Campaign for Safe Cosmetics. Message from the campaign promotes the toxic-free cosmetics. He pledged to replace hazardous chemicals found in cosmetic products with safer alternatives within three years. To accomplish this, asked the manufacturers of cosmetics in the U.S. to do four things:

Chemical form 1.Remove European Union banned all products sold worldwide.
2.Inventory all products of chemicals of concern.
3.Develop a plan to replace dangerous chemicals with safer alternatives within three years.
4. Report your progress in public.

Within a few months a small number of companies began to sign the Compact for Safe Cosmetics. In 2007, three years later, more than 500 companies had signed the Covenant. Ninety of these companies were from outside the U.S.. However, all the signatories and natural product companies, in particular, even a large U.S. cosmetics company was on the list. The reason? The U.S. cosmetics industry is the most regulated industry under the auspices of the FDA. How does the FDA determine whether a cosmetic product is safe, you might ask? The answer is no. Do not leave security to the individual companies themselves. In other words, if the cosmetics company feels their product is safe, you can go on the market.

In 2007, the Campaign for Safe Cosmetics published a full page ad in USA today. The ad said "putting on makeup should not be like playing with matches" and showed a smearing lipstick little girl in her face. Three major cosmetics companies were named in the advertisement. Within three months, three companies of cosmetics in the EU to remove the chemicals banned in lipstick and produced what essentially became a non-toxic product.

Let's be clear here. This example represents a single product in a line of cosmetic products reach hundreds of cosmetic company. Therefore, although this was a big step forward, it's just a small step in the grand scheme of things, with the final mission is to reach all cosmetics companies to reformulate their lines to the new standards for toxic-free ingredients of products resulting in the safe, healthy, toxic-free cosmetics worldwide.

Everyone can help advance this very important process over the shops and buy only certified organic products for personal care. To do this we must seek certification logos of cosmetic products they buy. These logos will be highlighted along with the logos of non-animal testing, bio-degradable, etc.